Introduction: This article explains law – evasion from the procedural justice theory point of view considering Tom Taylor theory. The Law evasion is a behavior that disregards formal norms in society. This research a new classification of law evasion ispresented it is differedbetween: soft and hard law evasion. This research explains soft law evasion. The soft law evasion includes all behaviors that disregard formal law in society and also is nonviolent, occasionally, and often is encountered with no punishment. This research analyzes the correlation between procedural injustice, political illegitimacy, civic distrust and law-evasion.Method: This is a descriptive-correlative survey. We applied Multi- stage sampling, a sample of 400tehran citizen over 24was chose to fill out study questionnaires.Findings: when people notice unfair and injustice law performance procedures, the law obedience behavior declines. In this situation, lack of procedural justice in law performance make authorities lost their legitimacy in view of people. This subject make people law evasion in society. These three variables (procedural injustice, civic distrust, illegitimacy) together explain %27 of variation of dependent variable.conclusion: When law performance procedures are injustice, people’s next behavior in front of law will not resemble with prior position. In fact, procedural Injustice and law prejudicial performance will change people orientation into authorities. The prejudicial condition of law performance via authorities reduces people’s trust into them and people question their legitimacy at the end. These variable reciprocal effects afford persons law-evasion in society. In fact, in this condition people prefer law-evasion versus law-obedience.

This article initiates by presenting a critique of the extant approaches in the analysis of how the law is observed in the Iran. It then proceeds to examine the degree and the type of factors affecting law obedience. The basic problem with the previous analyses concerning law evasion in Iran is that it has too strongly linked the presence of law in the Iranian society on the one hand with the political absolutism, and on the other, with ecological factors. Thus, these analyses are somewhat indifferent to the question of surveillance and the development of surveillance institutions. In other words, there exists an apparent indifference as to surveillance and punishment in society and in everyday life. This article deals with the role these institutions play in enhancing obedience to law in society.  

Social order in social relations forms the basis of collective life. Disturbance in social relations can cause social disorder. The statement on theoretical framework in this research is that the erosion of social capital, that which is being called here Weak Intergroup objective and subjective relations in society, can result in disorder or law evasion. So this article explains the effect of erosion of social capital on law-evasion. In this research theories of Putnam and fukuyama are used for the analysis of social capital erosion. The method is that of the survey research. The statistical population of this study consists of all women and men of over 24 years of age in Tehran. The data was collected by the questionnaire from a sample of size 400 persons in Tehran. The method of sampling is that of multi-stage sampling. After data collection, research hypotheses were examined at two inferential and descriptive levels by Amos and SPSS package. Law evasion is divided in two dimensions: objective law-evasion (behavior) and subjective law-evasion (orientation). In contextual variables, meaningful relationship is seen among gender, marriage status, and type of job, age, education, economic position, with two dimensions of law- evasion. Basic variables in this research with their total effect on dependent variable consist of societal conception of individualism (%17), extreme individualism (%.32), civil distrust (%.15), generalized distrust (0.0109), weak formal relation (%.03) and informal relation (%.24). Generally, these independent variables explain %25 of the dependent variable variance (objective law-evasion).Whereas these variables (except informal relations) explain %40 of subjective law-evasion variance. The results show that social capital erosion has more effect on subjective law-evasion (orientation) than on objective law-evasion (behavior). Hence supporting intergroup social capital in society can revive law orientations and thereof obedience of the law in society.

Background and aim: Today, law evasion is considered a social and managerial challenge that hinders societal development. Its primary consequences include diminishing public trust, endangering security and stability, and undermining democratic values and ethics. This research aimed to design a model of the factors influencing law evasion in government organizations of Gilan Province.Method: This applied research is descriptive-survey in nature and follows a developmental mixed-methods approach. The qualitative sample consisted of 18 experts, university professors, managers from regulatory bodies, and judges from the Administrative Justice Court, selected through purposive non-probability sampling. The quantitative population comprised all employees of government organizations in Gilan Province, from which 382 participants were selected using Cochran’s formula and stratified random sampling. Data collection involved the Delphi panel for the qualitative phase and a researcher-made questionnaire for the quantitative phase. Data were analyzed using the Delphi technique (qualitative) and structural equation modeling (quantitative) via SPSS 26 and SmartPLS 3 software.Results: The findings identified six main factors—economic, political, cultural, structural, supervisory, and individual—as well as 15 variables influencing law evasion in government organizations. Based on this, a model was developed to understand the contributing factors.Conclusion: The qualitative results ranked the factors by influence on law evasion: economic, political, cultural, structural, supervisory, and individual. The quantitative results confirmed the model’s good fit. Additionally, the most influential pathways identified were from economic factors to structural factors, and from structural factors to supervisory ones.

Law evasion is one of the persistent social challenges in Iran, with far-reaching consequences for public order, political legitimacy, and sustainable development. This study aims to examine the multifaceted dimensions of law evasion by conducting a qualitative meta-synthesis (meta-aggregation) based on a systematic review of 25 peer-reviewed Iranian studies published between 2005 and 2021.Findings reveal that law evasion in Iran is influenced by a combination of demographic, social, economic, cultural, political, managerial, and environmental factors. Theoretical frameworks such as Durkheim and Merton's anomie theory, Hirschi’s social control theory, Putnam’s social capital theory, and the theory of social bonds were most frequently applied in explaining this phenomenon.To effectively address law evasion, policy actions are needed at multiple levels: strengthening social capital through trust-building and civic engagement, enhancing procedural justice and fair enforcement of the law, promoting a culture of law-abiding behavior through education and media, restoring institutional legitimacy, supporting vulnerable groups, and reforming supervisory and executive structures. These findings offer valuable insights for evidence-based policymaking and preventive strategies to reduce law evasion in the Iranian context

The escape of law is always one of the causes of the problems and tragedies in all societies, depending on their cultural, social, Economic and geographical context, they have different types. The importance of this issue has led researchers to research these factors in a few decades. The purpose of this essay was to investigate the effect of five major personality factors on the traffic safety law of Kamyaran city drivers. samples number included 200 experienced drivers assess which of the five major personality factors (extroversion, neuroticism, religiosity, conscientiousness, openness) are more violent while driving, and also to determine which personalities Driving in a more risky way. It also included a sample of the Factors Affecting Accidents questionnaire to examine the impact of various factors on accidents and to determine which of the factors had the greatest impact on road accidents. The sampling was done using available sampling method. A brief neo-form questionnaire was used to identify personality types. Also, a questionnaire was used to identify high-risk behaviors and rule-making, and a questionnaire was used to assess the factors affecting road accidents. A questionnaire was used to assess the validity of this questionnaire in other research. Finally, the results are summarized as follows: Personality traits: Pleasure, conscientiousness and extroversion have a significant effect on high-risk behaviors.

Disrespect for and rejection of law by human beings is among the most serious social pathologies which have always been and is wrestling with humankind. If law invasion in a society exceeds the norms this can pose a threat to social system and cause server damage to it. This phenomenon as a social pathology is caused by numerous factors. Social capital due to creating a positive existential potentialities and capacities within the individual can prevent this to happen. The aim of this article is to determine the inter-relationships between social capital and law evasion. The method of research was survey and population study was Yazd city citizens (marriage people) in year in 1390. The sample study includes 362 citizens that were selected in multistage cluster. The main technique of gathering data was investigated questionnaire with suitable validity and reliability. Then, this information given to spss program. The results indicate: There were inverse relationship between social capital and law evasion. Also, there were inverse relationship between indicators of social capital as (social participation, civil engagement, social support, interpersonal trust, and trust to legislative) and law-evasion. But no existence relationship between sense of security and awareness to law and law-evasion. The regression analysis also indicates the three variable of interpersonal trust, trust to legislative and civil engagement, explained the 12.2 percent of variance of law-evasion. Therefore the struggle of officials and those in authority for enhancing the trust, increasing social participation and civil engagement can be reduce the grounds for social pathologies.

Background and Aim: The discussion of the transition to strict regulation is one of the neglected aspects of international law, which this article with emphasis on the Paris Convention on Climate Change seeks to explain and analyze. Materials and Methods: This article is Analytical descriptive and uses the library method. Ethical considerations: In this article, Originality of texts, honesty and trusteeship Has been complied. Results: In international law, we see a transition from hard law to soft law. in the field of environmental issues, This is especially true. Soft rights increasing attention due to their flexibility and adaptability to conditions, the creation of conditions for broad government participation, and the reduction of their resistance to the implementation of directives have received. The mentioned features of soft law it to have a high potential in international agreements and collective decisions, especially in the field of environmental issues have caused. Conclusion: The Paris Convention on Climate Change a number of commitments for developed, small and developing countries to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, which can be explained in terms of soft law has defined. Lack of mandatory enforcement guarantees as enshrined in hard law and voluntary commitments of members based on cooperation and coexistence of states and the development of a dispute settlement mechanism based on compromise and cooperation are the most important examples and aspects of transition from hard rights to soft rights in the Paris Convention on Climate Change.

In every society, social order has a paramount importance. It is because stability os societies is dependent on maintaining social order.Social order can not be maintined unless people give respect to the contracted norms. When some people dismiss formal norms of society, law evasion and law breaking conditions will be created. But when a large number of people dismiss laws and norms, law evasion turns out to be asocial problem. The presents article is conducted to analyse the law evasipn effective factors from sociological point of view. The research which is based on an intefrative and multi‐facet approach, investifated the contextual, social, economic, and political fators of law evasion and gives recommendeations to increase law fulness in the society.